Is our beloved Google Dead?

2008 September 22
by Chirag Chamoli
Google Dead

Google Dead

In a recent post where cultavix had written really good article on Chrome, to which I had plainly said chrome was stupid. Come to think of it, if, we are picking up the early signs of death of the romanticism for Google .

Now have a look at the list below a few people who left google to start something “better”, why what happened? Doesn’t Google provide 20% off anymore? or It is does not respect ideas anymore. I believe they have lost it, don’t worry though google will not have a  sudden death, it will morph into Microsoft for Internet. Your Comments?

Cuil is led by Anna Patterson, a former leader of Google’s search index and her husband, Tom Costello, who researched and developed search engines at Stanford University and IBM. The two, president and CEO, respectively, met at Stanford.

A New York City startup called Howcast was launched in February 2008 and is youtube of instructional videos. In fact, the three founders—Jason Liebman, Daniel Blackman and Sanjay Raman—are ex-Google employees who worked on Google Video and YouTube before they left.

FriendFeed aims to be a one stop shop for all your social networking updates and news items. The four founders were all team members at Google and helped to launch such products as Google Maps, Adsense, GMail and Google Groups. They’ve brought their expertise to a slightly different area: social network aggregating.

Former Google Product Manger, Steffen Mueller, has launched Topicle, a new search engine community. The service, which went live today, uses a model similar to that of Wikipedia, allowing anyone to contribute to the creation and enhancement of their own vertical search engines.

Plinky, a new social media startup from ex-Googler Jason Shellen has raised a $1.5 million first round from Polaris Ventures, reports GigaOM. He actually came to Google (NSDQ: GOOG) through its 2003 acquisition of PyraLabs (parent of Blogger). So what’s Plinky? Not clear. Om suspects it has something to do with making content creation easier, and Shellen himself says that it’s not Blogger 2.0 or a MySpace-Killer (that’s good), but that it “should help make using any social site more interesting.

Sacca, 32, left the Internet search company this month for a new career as a venture capitalist. He joins a growing number of Google millionaires hoping to parlay their newfound wealth into even greater riches by bankrolling technology start-ups.

Google has lost another good one. The “godfather” of AdSense Gokul Rajaram has left his top position at Google to pursue his own ventures. Rajaram, 33, has offered no indication as to what his entrepreneurial project/s will be, but I have a feeling he’s got a few ideas cooking on the back burner. What he has said, though, is that he’s interested on the consumer Internet side.

Ooyala, a video platform founded by two seasoned Google veterans, has launched a powerful new analytics backend for its service that it calls Backlot Analytics. The new analytics software allows content providers to get an extremely detailed data on their users’ viewing behaviors, helping them tweak their ad placement and future content selection. Backlot Analytics will be available as a native application in Adobe AIR, and will also work in the browser.

Google to Internet Applications  is equal to Microsoft was/is to Software Applications, Both companies want to own everything.

This is just a partial list, I mean we get the point, Whats Your Say?

Update:

“GOOGLE controls about 70 percent of the search advertising market. Doesn’t that give it a monopolist’s ability to set prices as high as it wishes?”

Apparently more than a few traders had heart palpitations today. As the market closed, Google’s share price appeared to fall apart, falling to $200 from an opening price of $396. At least that’s what the Nasdaq ticker showed.

21 Responses leave one →
  1. 2008 September 10

    Looks like it…
    Chrome is not a complete failure but Google last product – Google Lively (.. Heard of it??) definitely is.Moreover,from Indian perspective what Google is doing with Adsense Publishers is unforgivable, Its declining payments to Indian publisher and at the same time accepting ads (via Adwords) from Indian Companies.. Sooner or later things will surface and the Google bubble will burst…
    But still, M a Google fan as it moulded the people Chirag mentioned above into what they are today.

    cx: Tarun, bubble has to burst some day and Yes you are right on the last point, point taken.

  2. 2008 September 10

    i still think that google is very much alive and willing to work with the comunity to overcome some of its problems, like user privacy which I just posted about

    cx: That is just a fire fighting mechanism from their side, I mean first they create the problem and then solve it not counted ;)

  3. 2008 September 10

    by the way, added #59 to the how to get more traffic page, “#59 Ping your blog everytime you update! @ http://pingomatic.com

    //cx: People do have a look at a really wonderful article by cultavix on : How to get traffic on your blog. Cultavix thanks.

  4. 2008 September 10

    Hi Chirag –

    I’m a newbie here. Nice article, provocative points, perceptive research.

    We should be careful, before reading too far into employee activity. This is Silicon Valley, with some of the highest employee turnover levels in the world; so HR activity may not be – at least in aggregate – the best way of anticipating a company’s imminent decline; particularly that of a company with Google’s size and scale.

    Neither, incidentally, is lower-than-average performance of a few individual products. Google’s mainstay area – search, and information processing – are strong, and growing, and diversifying (see the latest articles on Google’s newspaper digitising, for instance).

    Yes, they’ve got threats from people like Cuil (who ran into some trouble with their search – which threw up porn for very innocent queries); but this is a platform business, and Google’s got market share going for it. Diversifying off the platform is not going to be the hardest thing in the world to do – and Google isn’t half bad at doing that. Disrupting Google would arguably involve disrupting the very concept of internet search; and that would take a lot more firepower than this.

    Very interesting viewpoints, here.

    RN

  5. 2008 September 10

    hmm good collection :) Its been a while since I used friendfeed.. going to try it again now :)

    cx: Shall we start something there together, on FF?

  6. 2008 September 11

    I think google not dead yet… only lose a little of piece.

    //cx: but if we look at the pattern wasn’t the same thing happening with MS, some time back?

  7. 2008 September 11

    I think Google will be taken over by Microsoft at some point, i.e. Hotmail and many, many others, listed here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_companies_acquired_by_Microsoft_Corporation

    //cx: why so?

  8. 2008 September 11
    ejoftheweb permalink

    It’s bad when any company owns such a large amount of any market.
    IBM used to own the personal computer market, until Microsoft pushed them aside by taking control of a different market: desktop operating systems. Google is pushing aside Microsoft’s control of the desktop by controlling search. Or rather, online advertising. And, in time, someone will push aside Google’s control of online advertising by taking over something else. Probably.

    //cx: Thanks Edwardm, I agree we are in dire need of a disruption.

  9. 2008 September 12

    Google reins supreme and will remain that way for at least another 5 + years. Yahoo and Fox are just too far behind to pull back up to the competition.

    cx: I will have to agree with you on this one, all of them are fighting the game with google’s rules and setting the field a part with there own. Just like Google vs MS.

  10. 2008 September 13

    :)

    cx: Thanks

  11. 2008 September 13

    why chrome, I mean it it tarnishes, needs constant attention to keep it gleaming and frankly is best avoided on any modern product….no Google is just fine as is

    cx: Couldn’t have said better. I feel Google wants control the supply side of the ads so that they can reduce the margins for other browser.

  12. 2008 September 15

    I am not surprising to anything. But thanks..

  13. 2008 September 19

    IMO Google Chrome doesn’t bring anything new.

    I used to browse the web with Firefox since it was named Mozilla. As Firefox is very customizable through its sets of extensions I see no reason to switch to Google Chrome.

    This is obviously not the Google product I’m fan of.

    See you,
    Arthur Orchid.

  14. 2008 October 1

    possible, in web 2.0, because if people start hating google for some reason, any new or existing company can take up the space quite easily,

  15. 2008 October 1

    google dead ? :O
    na….it would take ages to bring it down..half of the internet is ruled by it .. :d

    cx: Thanks Arvind, Welcome :) .

    Agree with you that

    half of the internet is ruled by it

    a) But they don’t create any content
    b) Microsoft was big before they took them down in one area!!

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. Dynamic disruption « Athensboy’s Weblog
  2. Google done for? « ¿Que paso U.S.A.?
  3. What John McCain and Barack Obama are buying on Google « Dynamic Disruption
  4. Google ‘vs’ Microsoft, Business As Usual « Dynamic Disruption
  5. Nominations So Far…(Updated 06/Oct…still more to come) « Visceral Observations
  6. Final List of Nominated Posts « Visceral Observations

Leave a Reply

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS